Just a reminder…

18 07 2010

I will be out of town starting tomorrow and will not be back for almost two weeks (August 1). During that time I will still be “posting.” These posts are actually scheduled posts that I wrote before leaving town.

Comments will be shut off since I have no way of moderating or interacting with commenters. Comments will resume once I am back in town. I will simply create an “open thread” discussion on the posts I made and if anyone desires to make a comment, ask a question, or challenge something I said, they will be more than free to do so in those open threads.





I just discovered E-bay…

19 06 2010

I’ve known about E-bay for a while actually, but never purchased anything from there. Mainly, I didn’t know how it worked. The other day, someone showed me how fun it is to waste time on there. Then I came across Alexander Roberts’ Ante Nicene Fathers series (the collection of all the Church Fathers prior to 325AD). This series sells for about $200. I got it for hardly a quarter of that price, supposedly in new condition (I guess we’ll find out in a few days).

Suffice it to say, I think I have found a new favorite website.





And now for something completely different…

10 06 2010

I usually write serious things on this site that deal with culture. But for those who don’t know, I’m a HUGE college football fan. I’m an even bigger Oklahoma Sooners fan. How big? When the Sooners went to the Big XII Championship in 2008, I drove almost 10 hours to go to the game. Even though it was 10 degrees and all I had on were light jeans, a tshirt, and a coat, I stayed for all four quarters. So it’s safe to say that I love my Sooners and I love college football.

So when all the recent conference talk and paying quite a bit of attention to it, I decided to have some fun and make some predictions on what I think conferences will look like starting at the 2012-2013 football season:

Read the rest of this entry »





New Entry on the Comment Policy

9 06 2010

For those not aware, I have added a new entry to the “Comment Policy.”

Recently, I’ve had three or four people post comments on my blog that were very well thought out, very respectful, and very interesting. The problem is, I hardly have time for even a simple discussion, much less one that requires me to think. I don’t see my time freeing up anytime soon, except on weekends, which is when I generally try to reply to comments.

So please, if I don’t reply, do not take this for a lack of interest or me giving up or just trying to ignore you. I simply do not have the time and for that, I apologize. I feel like my lack of time is robbing me (and others) of a very good and informational discussion.

Also, if I get similar comments, what I’ll tend to do is just make a big post to deal with them as an overall topic (if I can even get around to that…well researched articles are sparse on this site for a reason).





A new Bible version

14 01 2010

This looks like an interesting interpretation and one that I look forward to reading.

The sad thing is, this might as well sum up liberation theology.





New Approach to Theories on the Origins of the Universe

10 01 2010

Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking have been instrumental in supplying alternative theories to the creation of matter. The late Sagan proposed the idea of an eternal universe and Hawking has supplied his own theories on how the Big Bang is not actually the beginning of the universe. Of course, due to recent evidence, it’s becoming more and more clear that the universe does in fact have a finite beginning. This poses a problem because it inevitably raises the question of God.

It seems proponents of an eternal universe, or one that doesn’t have a finite beginning, have found a new way to teach their methods…via T-Pain (yes, I know the video is a joke, an absolutely hilarious one that needed a serious introduction):





New Blog

3 08 2009

I have gone into creating another blog with my friend Joshua M. Brown. Our areas of study (mine being bioethics as of late and his being philosophy of mind) have quite a bit of overlap, so we’ve decided to dedicate a blog solely to those issues.

So, please visit our new blog “Virtus et Vita (Of Virtue and Life)” for issues pertaining to what man is composed of, ethical dealings of abortion, euthanasia, and all issues related.





More Random Thoughts for the Day

19 07 2009

- Liberal ethics: everyone is the victim…except the victim

- “I”m raising awareness.” So what? If I am aware that my neighbor’s house is on fire and he is trapped inside, I can still go to jail if I don’t take action on that awareness.

- Pop culture is full of emptiness because it has forsaken God. It is not that God has cursed them with being empty; it is more that such a culture has, in forsaking God, forsaken their purpose in life, thus all other pursuits are done in vain, which leads to emptiness.

- Postmodern ethics: everything is subjective, except tolerance…and traditionalist beliefs are always wrong

- One can have all the money in the world and the latest technological devices, but still feel incomplete. Happiness is found in the simple things in life; love of God, love of family, and love of virtue are what make a man happy.

- Congress has an oversight committee. They are called the American people. Americans have forgotten that they are the final “check” and the final “balance” in the check and balance system.

- Wearing a t-shirt or putting a bumper sticker on your car to bring about “awareness” is the greatest form of narcissism. It lets everyone know that you care, that you are aware, that you understand human rights, and gives you the self-satisfaction of doing something good without actually doing anything. Everyone wants to appear to be Mother Theresa without doing any of the things she did.

- Prosecuting people in the Bush administration at this point in the new administration is not an accident. It is Obama’s “Wag the Dog.” The health care initiative is becoming more and more unpopular – if he can focus the attention back to Bush, he knows he can get support for his plan. It is a dishonest way to pass a bill.





Taxes 101

16 07 2009

What’s more effective and moral:

A parent who uses negative reinforcement to stop his child from acting out, or a parent who attempts to use positive reinforcement (though negative reinforcement will be needed at times)?

A boss who puts restrictions on his employees and adds rules, or a boss who gives bonuses and raises for employees who do more than is required of them?

A teacher who consistently marks down the grades of students for the smallest mishaps, or a teacher who adds points when the student does more than expected of him?

In most cases, though negative reinforcement is needed to “motivate” those who just don’t care, positive reinforcement works far better. When people realize they can get a deal for doing something, they’ll almost always do that “something.” So when it comes to health care, under a capitalistic system, doesn’t it make far more sense to offer substantial tax breaks to employers who offer health care for full time employees?

Doesn’t it make far more sense to offer even bigger tax breaks to those who give health insurance to part-time employees? Doesn’t it make sense to offer tax breaks to people who pay for their own insurance (which, by the way, contributes to the economy)? Doesn’t it make more sense to offer even bigger tax breaks for those who add supplemental insurance? Doesn’t it make more sense to offer a tax break to employers who pay double the minimum wage for their employees (and make sure the tax break supplements the money lost on payroll)?

Read the rest of this entry »





NoH8

16 06 2009

There’s a big grassroots movement right now against California’s Proposition 8 (banning homosexual marriages) called “NoH8.” 

I find this group very interesting. For one, I’m assuming that their end goal is to change California’s constitution. But what bothers me is the automatic assumption that if you’re against homosexual marriage or against the homosexual lifestyle, you somehow hate homosexuals. This baffles me. 

I’m hate promiscuity – as are many other Americans (including homosexuals). Does this mean I hate people who are promiscuous? I hate alcoholism. Does this mean I hate alcoholics? I hate drugs. Does this mean I hate drug addicts? Just because I hate the action does not mean I hate the person involved in the action. The reason for this is that what we do does not always define who we are. 

So I can disagree with a lifestyle choice and think that choice is wrong, but still not hate the person who made the choice. 

Unfortunately, however, the hope of civil discourse is thin. If you disagree with a lifestyle, then you are automatically branded as a “hater.” I can’t disagree with homosexual marriages without likewise being called a hater. Thus, any hope of a “civil discourse” on the matter is impossible; any opposing views are pushed into the same category as “racism” and other social taboos and subsequently shut out. It’s the attitude of, “Let’s discuss this…unless you disagree with me.” 

Thus, the whole “No H8″ rhetoric is disingenuous. Being against homosexual marriage is not the same at hating homosexuals.