A Christian Response to the Healthcare Bill

24 03 2010

In looking at the healthcare bill that was recently passed, I am left with one overriding conclusion; the Church in America has completely and utterly failed to do her job. This statement, however, is quite open-ended. So let me elaborate with a follow-up:

Though I hate what the current administration is doing, we must realize that their advancements are only occurring because the Church has failed America; rather than living as the Church and taking care of the needy, we instead chose to retreat into our million-dollar sanctuaries. If a needy world can’t turn to the followers of the one true God, what choice are they left with other than to turn to the government?

Though I am very much against nationalized healthcare, especially when taxpayer money will most likely be used for abortions, I don’t want to take the time writing against it. What’s done is done, every argument that could be made against nationalized healthcare has been made. The courts will see to the legality of this bill and, in my opinion, the people will speak out against the bill in the form of elections this coming November. But what if, when elected, the Republicans rescind the bill? Or, what if tomorrow Obama and half of the Democratic Party woke up and thought, “No, wait, this is wrong”? Those who will be covered by this healthcare bill would then be left without the chance to get proper healthcare.

From a purely human perspective, I would argue that I have no obligation to help get better healthcare for a stranger. I have no obligation to see to a stranger’s needs; while I can do it, it’s not necessarily immoral for me to see to the needs of my own family and then my own immediate community, but then stop there. Thus, the healthcare bill is wrong because it takes a non-obligation and attempts to make it an obligation.

The problem, however, is that as a Christian I am held to a higher moral code. What would generally be supererogatory actions become obligations for Christians. The Christian obligation to his fellow human is more than “do not kill,” but instead as Christians we are to look after the needs of others. However, as a whole the Christian Church has not been doing this in America; so what are the poor, the disadvantaged, and the crippled supposed to do?

Read the rest of this entry »





Do you love Christ enough to remove your tie?

9 03 2010

I remember being asked the question once, “Do you love Christ enough to remove your tie?” The person was essentially saying that if dressing down in church would help people feel more comfortable in church, would I willingly forsake the traditional church attire (“Sunday’s Best”)?

To someone of my generation, this seems like a very simple and easy to answer question; absolutely! We hate dressing up as it is, so why not? To the older generation, such a question may be a stumbling block. After all, if you love God why wouldn’t you want to look your best for Him when you enter His house?

For whatever reason, this question has been on my mind lately. I keep wondering what traditions we hold onto that prevent us from being effective in our witness of the Gospel. I remember when I was younger my youth pastor getting in trouble for allowing “ghetto-youth” to interact with the “church-youth.” Tradition dictated that in church you behaved a certain way. If you wanted to roughhouse then go outside, don’t do it inside the church. Tradition dictated that you don’t wear shorts to church, unless of course it’s Sunday night, but then said shorts must be accompanied with a buttoned up shirt or a polo.

In our pursuit of the perfect church, I think we’ve missed sight of what the perfect church looks like. Just because a church has nicely dressed people sitting in the pews (or movie theater seats if your church prefers to be modern, or no seats at all if your church prefers to be Orthodox) doesn’t mean all is well with the congregation. The ideal church is one full of flaws, full of those who do dress up and those who don’t, but in all their physical differences grace and community abound.

What traditions do we hold onto that inhibit us from reaching others for Christ? What traditions are actually counter-intuitive to being a witness of Christ. Certainly we must keep doctrine and must maintain our ethics (so long as they are based on Scripture and tradition), but what of those things that lack a proper backing? How do we maintain our orthodoxy, but rid ourselves of silly traditions that do nothing to benefit our growth or witness in Christ?





“The Hope of Love”

4 03 2010

This is a chapter from the manuscript I have recently finished. It is copyrighted, so no stealing! (Why anyone would steal sub-par writing is beyond me). I am currently having a group of people look at the manuscript and edit it, but I have yet to find a publisher. If anyone knows a publisher that might be interested, please send them my way.

Read the rest of this entry »