…and just when I get onto the Emergent Conversation….

20 08 2009

…John Piper decides to talk about the Minnesota tornado. He believes that God sent the tornado as a warning to the Lutherans for deciding to accept homosexuals as priests.

Now, it should be very apparent from my previous posts that, (1) I’m conservative both in my politics and doctrine, (2) I hold to the traditional view of sin, that sin is an affront to God, (3) that the act of homosexuality is a sin before God, and (4) that I like John Piper. But his actions on this one are simply too far. Let me explain why.

Any time a natural calamity comes as a judgement from God in the Bible, someone is always warned about it beforehand. So we’re left with two options on this: Either God warned Piper and Piper didn’t tell anyone (which would be awful considering that’s not a move toward reconciliation) or God didn’t tell Piper anything and Piper is just drawing an unwarranted conclusion.

Could it be that God still sends disasters upon us to get our attention? Of course, I am not naive enough to believe God somehow lost His ability to judge. But at the same time, I’m not sure it’s our place to say, “God did this to you because of x.” For instance, can we say that the flooding of New Orleans Baptist Seminary from Katrina was God’s punishment on the SBC for it’s obsession with numbers and prosperity? How many Southern Baptists, who applaud Piper’s assessment of the “Lutheran Tornado”, would feel comfortable with the idea that God would punish the SBC for its flaws?

It is apparent that this particular synod has a sin issue within their church. When they are meeting to discuss whether or not practicing homosexuals can be priests, that shows they have lost a respect for the Bible. But it should be equally apparent to us that some conservative churches have a major issue with sin. What of the churches where the pastor’s affair is simply glossed over in the name of “forgiveness,” but the student who struggles with homosexual feelings is thrown to the streets? What of the churches where the poor are looked down upon, but the rich are allowed to continue in their greed? What of the churches that spend millions on building bigger and better churches, but grudgingly hand out a can of soup to a starving family? Where are these church’s tornadoes? Where are their floods? Where are their calamities?

Yes, the acceptance of homosexual acts betrays a deep sin issue within a church, but so does pride. So does the unchecked competition between neighborhood churches. But when one of these churches undergoes a crisis, where are those who say that God brought it about?

Sin is sin, whether it is from a liberal or a conservative. Sin exists and if we condemn it in one area, we must condemn it in all. If we attribute a natural disaster to God’s action against the Lutherans, then we must also consider the natural disasters that take out conservative bastions as well.

This may not make me popular among some, but I’d rather be consistent than popular. I believe John Piper was wrong in this and it needs to be pointed out.





An open letter to the emergent movement

20 08 2009

To Whom It May Concern:

Back when I was struggling in my life, reading some of your books (Messy Spirituality, Adventures in Missing the Point, A New Kind of Christian, etc) provided me an escape from the fundamentalism I had come to loath. I attended a church where every week I heard the pastor rail against women who got abortions, bash homosexuals (in private he called them “fags” and didn’t want them in the church), harp on liberals, and repeat that cycle Sunday after Sunday. All the while, I had no spiritual nourishment, so I grew bitter.

Your books, at the time, were a breath of fresh air. I saw Christians who, rather than rant and rave against the ills of the world, actually taught that we should be the solution. This meant quite a bit to me.

But as time has moved on, I have read more and, to be quite frank, I no longer see the difference between the fundamentalism I came to loath and the Emergent movement I see before my eyes. I appreciate the call to justice, I appreciate pointing out the flaws of conservative Christianity, which has become and is becoming a dead orthodoxy, but my concerns with you far outweigh the positive aspects I see.

Please, don’t take this open letter as a power play on my part, or a mockery of the Emergent Conversation. These are genuine concerns. The fact is, Christianity in the West is in desperate need for an authentic movement, but this movement must have its foundation in authentic doctrine and authentic actions. If either is missing, the movement will fail – either because it lacks the substance to hold it together (proper doctrine) or because it lacks the heart to carry on (proper actions).

Read the rest of this entry »





Christianity and Postmodernity

20 08 2009

This is the thesis that I wrote last semester as part of a requirement for college (the topic was required, just a thesis). Anyway, as it is quite long, I have put it in PDF format.

I hope you enjoy.

The Christian Response to Postmodernism