<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Conversation with the Emergent Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/</link>
	<description>Reshaping the world through rational and relational Christianity</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 04:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A response by Mark Scandrette &#171; The Christian Watershed</title>
		<link>http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A response by Mark Scandrette &#171; The Christian Watershed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jborofsky.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my last post I wrote about a conversation I had with Tony Jones and Doug Pagitt and also alluded to the conversation my friend had with Mark [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post I wrote about a conversation I had with Tony Jones and Doug Pagitt and also alluded to the conversation my friend had with Mark [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joshearls</title>
		<link>http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joshearls]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jborofsky.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nice.  dude, i&#039;ve got to admit, i probably would have only heard what those guys said and complained some in the car on the way home.  Its pretty awesome that you guys went forward and talked to them afterwards.  

what happens when we remove conviction from the gospel?  the very essence of the good news is that God made a way through His Son for those of us who were sinful and hopeless to have relationship with Him.  If we never approach people about their sinfulness and hopefulness, what will make them realize their need for the gospel?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice.  dude, i&#8217;ve got to admit, i probably would have only heard what those guys said and complained some in the car on the way home.  Its pretty awesome that you guys went forward and talked to them afterwards.  </p>
<p>what happens when we remove conviction from the gospel?  the very essence of the good news is that God made a way through His Son for those of us who were sinful and hopeless to have relationship with Him.  If we never approach people about their sinfulness and hopefulness, what will make them realize their need for the gospel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew J. Nicewander</title>
		<link>http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew J. Nicewander]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jborofsky.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In reflecting back on what Tony said – both in the show and the interview – I’m left wondering why everything has to be ‘either/or.’ Why does it have to be either doctrine or love? Why can’t it be both? Why can’t it be that our doctrine about God draws us closer to Him in love?&quot;

Excellent, excellent point.   Action flows from thought.  Good doctrine without Christ-like love reveals itself to be bad doctrine.  Christ-like love without the doctrines about Christ reveals itself to be a love that&#039;s not Christ-like at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In reflecting back on what Tony said – both in the show and the interview – I’m left wondering why everything has to be ‘either/or.’ Why does it have to be either doctrine or love? Why can’t it be both? Why can’t it be that our doctrine about God draws us closer to Him in love?&#8221;</p>
<p>Excellent, excellent point.   Action flows from thought.  Good doctrine without Christ-like love reveals itself to be bad doctrine.  Christ-like love without the doctrines about Christ reveals itself to be a love that&#8217;s not Christ-like at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmatthanbrown</title>
		<link>http://thechristianwatershed.com/2008/07/17/my-conversation-with-the-emergent-church/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jmatthanbrown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jborofsky.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your &quot;friend&quot; sounds like such a jerk.  How could he be so Judgmental?  hehe]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your &#8220;friend&#8221; sounds like such a jerk.  How could he be so Judgmental?  hehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

