A simple approach to apologetics

20 04 2008

A lot of lay people have been asking me what Apologetics is, so I decided to put together this very short, but detailed explanation of what Apologetics is. It’s not meant to be an easy read, but to give a detailed fly-by on the issue, hopefully encouraging people to research it themselves.

What is Apologetics?

Within Christianity Apologetics is a tool that is used for the defense of the Christian faith. It comes from the Greek word apologia, which means ‘a ready defense.’ In the Greek the word has two meanings; one is militarily and the other deals with a courtroom. When the word is used in the New Testament (1 Peter 3:15) it is best ascribed to the court usage of the word.

When the word was used in a court setting, it was used with the defendant in the case. The defendant would bring forth evidence, logic, witnesses, and other proofs of his innocence – he would offer a logical and well thought out defense.

Christian Apologetics, then, is the rational defense of the Christian faith.

Read the rest of this entry »





Nietzsche: The most dangerous philosopher accepted into Christianity

10 04 2008

Nietzsche is becoming more and more obscure in modern Christian conversations and for this, the Church has paid – and will continue to pay – dearly. Nietzsche taught that there is no such thing as truth that there are only interpretations, and that God is dead. He attacked Christian beliefs as nothing more than attempts to garnish power. More revealing, however, is that there is a philosophic lineage that traces its way from Nietzsche, through the deconstructionists, and into the Emergent movement. Though there are problems with Nietzsche’s thought process, many in the movement have ignored these problems while those outside of the movement have been too apathetic to deal with his impact. Before one can understand and refute the modern day impacts of Nietzsche, however, one must understand what Nietzsche taught. Read the rest of this entry »





Existentialism: How it has affected modern Christianity

8 04 2008

When one thinks of the 19th Century, one often imagines the end of the Enlightenment within philosophy along with scientific positivism as the grand utopian hope for Western people; however, Existentialism finds its roots in the 19th Century as a response to the rampant rationalism that was left over from the Enlightenment. Existentialism was born out of the mind of Soren Kierkegaard as a Christian philosophy. It places a high emphasis on irrational faith that one acts on and does not study, thus rationality is devalued in theistic existentialism. Though born out of a 19th Century response to rationalism, its impact has spread into the 21st century and is finding its way into popular Christian books. Though Existentialism is helpful in reminding Christians that rationalism is inadequate, it destroys the idea that Christians can truly have a relationship with God.

Theistic existentialism is a system that devalues the rationality of faith – sometimes to the point of denying that faith is rational at all – and places a heavy reliance on experience within the faith. Francis Schaeffer defines existentialism as a “…theory of man that holds that human experience is not describable in scientific or rational terms.”[1] According to Schaeffer theistic existentialism seeks to deny that “faith” is something that can be rationally explained or studied and instead seeks to have nothing but an experience. This seems to be in line with the Swiss existentialist Karl Jaspers, who believed, “the claim of philosophy to prove or disprove God’s existence and agrees with Kant in rejecting this. For ‘a proved God would be no God but merely a thing in the world’.”[2] Whereas the orthodox faith prior to the 19th century attempted to prove the existence of God through appeals to nature, ‘orthodox’ theology, through the existentialists, appealed to nothing other than experience arguing that nothing could prove God, because He is beyond understanding. Read the rest of this entry »





The God Who Saves: A Look at Francis Schaeffer’s View of Salvation

6 04 2008

No other theologian in the 20th century had as big an impact on conservative evangelical Christianity than Francis Schaeffer; but often his view of salvation as substitutionary and ongoing is ignored when discussing his philosophy and theology. Schaeffer believed that salvation was a past, present, and future event that Christians partook in. Though Christians were justified at one time through the substitution of Christ on the cross – an irrevocable justification – he also taught that salvation was ongoing through sanctification and culminated in glorification. Though he might have put too much emphasis on the rational aspect of salvation in certain works, his works as a whole do an excellent job to show that salvation is both rational and relational. Though the apologetic works of Schaeffer are important, his teachings on salvation are invaluable.

            Francis Schaeffer was born January 30, 1912 in Pennsylvania to a nominally Christian home. Schaeffer parents groomed him to be an electrician by trade, but early in his teens he began to read philosophical works by Greek philosophers. After going through an agnostic stage in his walk, at the age of eighteen Francis Schaeffer was drawn to Christ. After coming to Christ he began to realize that one must believe in the inerrancy of the Bible and also live the truth of the Bible. Though he was raised in a nominally Christian home, Christ drew him to a deeper walk with the Lord.

            Though he did not have the intellectual fortitude earl in his Christian walk – the same fortitude that would define him later in his Christianity – he did see the importance of living and practicing the Christian faith. In the 1930s, when segregation was not only rampant, but seen as moral, Schaeffer would walk to an African American church to teach Sunday school to little children. Later, in the 1940s when Schaeffer was a pastor at a church, a family in his church couldn’t afford to send their child with Down’s syndrome to a special school. Schaeffer voluntarily went to that family’s house and tutored the child himself, on top of his other duties. These actions are best summed up by Bryan Follis when he states, “This is true Christian love – a compassion for those considered by society to be unimportant and a compassion that is costly in terms of time effort, and commitment.” This idea of Christian love – practicing the faith – was central to Schaeffer’s idea of sanctification within salvation.

            Even as Schaeffer grew in his intellectual understanding of Christianity, he never once deviated from the idea that salvation is a continuous action on this earth, manifested in the actions of Christians. In the 1950′s, Schaeffer founded L’Abri (“shelter”) in order to reach out to students in colleges. Students would come to Schaeffer with intellectual questions and while there were taken care of physically and spiritually. Schaeffer would feed them, give them a place to sleep, but also deal with the difficult questions they posed. To his death, Schaeffer was always concentrated on the person and never on the multitude of people. One time shortly before his death in 1984, Schaeffer was late for a speaking engagement for several thousand people, while staying in the United States. When the organizers finally found him, they discovered he was in his hotel room having a conversation about the Gospel with the maid. Schaeffer never abandoned his view that the Gospel was to be lived out.

Read the rest of this entry »